Author Guidelines

General Standards and Author Guidelines

Ethical Media Architecture and Educational Technology (EMAET) publishes only research and development studies that produce educational media, instructional models, digital applications, learning platforms, teaching materials, assessment instruments, intelligent learning systems, or other technology-based educational products.

Every product must demonstrate a substantial integration of ethical, moral, or religious values. Pure experimental studies, surveys, literature reviews, systematic literature reviews, bibliometric studies, qualitative studies, and other nondevelopment designs are outside the journal’s scope.

1. Language and Editing

Manuscripts must be written in clear and academically appropriate English. EMAET normally publishes articles in English and uses American English as its default language style. Authors who consistently use British English must indicate this on the first page of the manuscript.

Authors who are not confident in the quality of their English are encouraged to obtain professional language editing before submission. Language editing may improve readability but does not guarantee acceptance or influence the editorial decision.

The editorial team may request additional language revision when grammatical, terminological, or stylistic problems substantially affect the clarity of the manuscript.

2. Article Length

Manuscripts should contain approximately 5,000–8,000 words, including the abstract, tables, figure captions, acknowledgments, appendices, and references. Longer manuscripts may be considered when the complexity of the development process and empirical evaluation justifies the additional length.

3. Manuscript Format
  • File format: Microsoft Word document, preferably .docx.
  • Main text: Times New Roman, 12 pt, single-spaced.
  • Page size: A4 with consistent margins.
  • Pages and lines should be numbered to facilitate peer review.
  • Authors must use the official EMAET manuscript template.
4. Search Engine Optimization
  • Include important research terms in the article title.
  • Avoid unnecessarily long, vague, or overly creative titles.
  • Provide three to five specific and searchable keywords.
  • Include central keywords naturally in the opening sentences of the abstract.
  • Use relevant keywords in major section headings when academically appropriate.
5. Article Title

The title must be concise, informative, and written in title case. It should clearly indicate the educational product, development context, or principal contribution of the study.

Abbreviations, unnecessary technical expressions, sensational language, and unsupported claims should be avoided. The editorial office may recommend a revised title when the submitted title does not accurately represent the study.

6. Authors and Affiliations
  • Provide each author’s full and accurate name.
  • Affiliations should include the department or faculty when relevant, institution, and country.
  • Do not include street addresses, postal codes, academic positions, or unnecessary institutional details.
  • Identify the corresponding author and provide an active institutional or professional email address.
  • All listed authors must satisfy recognized authorship criteria and approve the submitted and final versions of the manuscript.
7. Headings and Subheadings
  • Main headings: Times New Roman, 14 pt, bold.
  • Subheadings: Times New Roman, 12 pt, bold.
  • Headings must be concise, consistent, and hierarchically organized.
8. Abstract and Keywords

The abstract must be written in English as one structured paragraph of no more than 300 words. It should briefly present:

  • research background and problem;
  • objective of the development study;
  • development model and participants;
  • principal findings on validity, practicality, usability, or effectiveness;
  • the ethical, moral, or religious value integrated into the product; and
  • main conclusion and contribution.

References, unexplained abbreviations, tables, figures, and unsupported claims must not appear in the abstract.

Authors must provide three to five keywords arranged alphabetically and separated by semicolons.

9. Abbreviations and Terminology

Abbreviations should be limited and defined at first use. Nonstandard, regional, technical, religious, or cultural terms must be explained clearly. A list of abbreviations may be included when numerous specialized terms are used.

10. Required Article Structure

EMAET research and development articles should normally contain:

  1. Introduction
  2. Method
  3. Results and Discussion
  4. Conclusion
  5. Acknowledgments, when applicable
  6. Funding Statement
  7. Conflict of Interest Statement
  8. Data Availability Statement, when applicable
  9. References
10.1 Introduction

The introduction must explain the educational problem, relevant technological context, theoretical foundation, previous studies, research gap, novelty, and purpose of the development study.

  • Begin with a concise account of the educational problem.
  • Present relevant and recent literature rather than an extensive general review.
  • Explain the limitations of existing educational products or approaches.
  • State the novelty of the proposed product.
  • Explain how ethical, moral, or religious values are integrated into the product.
  • End with a clear research objective or development purpose.
10.2 Method

The method must describe the development process with sufficient detail to permit evaluation and replication. Authors should report:

  • the research and development model, such as ADDIE, 4D, Borg and Gall, Design-Based Research, or another justified model;
  • development stages and activities completed at each stage;
  • research setting, participants, validators, users, and sampling procedures;
  • research instruments and evidence of their quality;
  • product validation, practicality, usability, and effectiveness procedures, according to the development stage;
  • quantitative or qualitative data-analysis procedures;
  • ethical approval, informed consent, confidentiality, and data protection, when human participants are involved; and
  • procedures used to ensure the credibility, reliability, or validity of findings.
10.3 Results and Discussion

Results should be reported according to the development stages and must demonstrate how the final educational product was produced, evaluated, and revised.

  • Describe the main features and design of the developed product.
  • Present evidence of validity, practicality, usability, or effectiveness.
  • Explain revisions made in response to expert or user feedback.
  • Demonstrate how ethical, moral, or religious values are embedded in the content, design, interaction, or learning outcomes.
  • Compare the findings with relevant previous studies and theories.
  • Explain the novelty, implications, limitations, and practical contribution.
  • Avoid claims that exceed the evidence provided by the study.

Results should not merely repeat information contained in tables and figures. The discussion must interpret the findings and explain their academic, pedagogical, technological, ethical, moral, or religious significance.

10.4 Conclusion

The conclusion should directly answer the research objective, summarize the principal product-development findings, state the product’s contribution, and explain its implications. It must not merely repeat the abstract or introduce new data, arguments, or references.

11. Acknowledgments and Funding

Acknowledgments may identify individuals, institutions, or organizations that contributed to the study but do not meet authorship criteria.

All financial support must be disclosed, including the funding institution, grant name, and grant number. When no external funding was received, authors should state this explicitly.

12. References
  • EMAET uses the APA 7th Edition referencing style.
  • Every in-text citation must appear in the reference list and vice versa.
  • Authors are encouraged to use Zotero, Mendeley, or another reference manager.
  • DOI links should be provided whenever available.
  • References should prioritize relevant, recent, and credible scholarly sources.
  • Unpublished manuscripts, unverifiable sources, and predatory publications should not be used as principal references.
Journal article with DOI

Maba, A. P. (2017). Paradoxical intervention dalam bimbingan dan konseling untuk mengatasi kecemasan. Counsellia: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 7(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.25273/counsellia.v7i2.1852

Book

Baron, R. A. (1977). Human aggression. Springer.

13. Tables and Figures
  • Tables and figures must be numbered consecutively and cited in the text.
  • Table titles should appear above the table; figure captions should appear below the figure.
  • Captions must be concise and understandable without extensive reference to the main text.
  • Tables should use editable text rather than images.
  • Figures should be original, legible, and free from unauthorized logos, copyrighted images, or personally identifying information.
  • Explain all colors, symbols, abbreviations, units, and panel labels.
  • Authors are responsible for obtaining permission to reproduce copyrighted material.
14. Image Requirements
  • Preferred formats: TIFF, JPEG, PNG, EPS, or high-quality PDF.
  • Minimum recommended resolution: 300 dpi at final publication size.
  • Color images should use RGB mode.
  • Text, labels, and symbols must remain readable after resizing.
  • Images should be uploaded separately when requested during submission.
15. Supplementary Material

Supplementary files may contain supporting datasets, extended instruments, application screenshots, audio, video, presentation files, additional tables, or other materials that cannot reasonably be included in the article.

Supplementary materials must not be used to hide essential methods, principal findings, or evidence required to evaluate the study. Each file must have a clear title, description, and citation in the manuscript.

Essential Development Requirements

A manuscript may be rejected during initial screening when it does not clearly present:

  • a recognized or justified development model;
  • systematic product-development stages;
  • a tangible educational product;
  • substantive ethical, moral, or religious integration;
  • empirical product evaluation; and
  • a clear contribution beyond existing products.

Authors must consult the official EMAET manuscript template and publication policies before submission. Manuscripts that do not follow the journal’s focus, structure, formatting, ethical standards, or research-development requirements may be returned to the authors or rejected before peer review.